Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.2-rt4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hiya, I am switching email-client currently, so excuse a bit of chaos.

I am reading https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_sort_of_real-time_performance_should_I_expect.3F

I think it sounds really interesting that you have 10-30uS latencies back in 2007. The concept sounds thorough and tried then. So I shouldn`t expect any big SMI messing things up, on my core2duo right?

I think I really wanna get this to work. No solutions? :)

I am reading more here:

https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch

"Works ok, but frequency scaling has to be turned off for decent results. A task run at 1 kHz repetition rate with low load was found to be t-distributed with 4 degrees of freedom, with 1% value 0.9842 ms, 99% value 1.0103 ms (ideal realtime performance would get exactly 1 ms for both values), with the frequency governor set to "performance"."

Quite low. So he has got it running with low jitter, on a core 2 quad.

SMI sounds not much of a problem then. I want this guys. Altough as said I am buying a computer, particulary for low-jitter, we can always try and make this work on my older box in the mean time.

Remember the prob is with threadirqs on mainline aswell. Could it be some clockproblem? A task for the thirsty bughunter, and patch-glory to mainline.

--
Fred være med deg / Peace Be with You,
Ove Karlsen
http://www.paradoxuncreated.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux