Re: Using random in interrupts for RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 10:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Thomas,
> 
> Ben Hutchings asked me if we still need "genirq: Disable random call on
> preempt-rt" for -rt? With commit 902c098a366 "random: use lockless
> techniques in the interrupt path" there is no more locks used. But does
> it still produce high latencies?

Ben,

Looks that the #ifndef can't be removed just yet. The code is not
totally lockless...


add_interrupt_randomness ->
	credit_entropy_bits ->
		kill_fasync ->
			kill_fasync_rcu ->
				spin_lock_irqsave(&fa->fa_lock, flags)

to make things worse, that spinlock turns into a mutex on -rt, so it may
crash the box if triggered.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux