On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 08:58 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 07:34 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > So that's where the question comes from. Life would be easier if RT > > didn't trigger the Dr. Jeckle -> Mr. Hyde thing. You know all about > > where what happens to which locks, so I'll just snip what I had quoted > > and needlessly commented on to keep this as short as possible ;-) > > I have no problem with making those non-GPL, as the original stance of > -rt back in 2005 was to not have -rt be any different than the vanilla > kernel in that regards. But I don't know if that policy changed since > then, nor am I the one that has the authority to remove the GPL tags > from those functions. As timing would have it, Thomas changed to ones that the nVidia driver griped about before I even got the query sent. I just built and ran it, it's happy in unmolested form. Dunno if this will make all RT module grumbles go away, but the nVidia ones should be toast. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
