On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/3/18 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote: > > > >> Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?" > > > > Aren't we all crazy ? > > > >> I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question... > > > > Too late. You should have put this before the question. > > > >> So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know > >> if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to > >> figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about > >> this kernel version.) > > > > We'll pull it into rt and figure out what breaks. > > Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset > development for 2.6.38 and on? Working on it. > It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap > between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before... > Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ? I concentrated on getting stuff upstream and reworking to make it more palatable and maintainable. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
