Re: [000/474] 2.6.33.8-longterm review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

2011/3/18 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"
>
> Aren't we all crazy ?
>
>> I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...
>
> Too late. You should have put this before the question.
>
>> So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know
>> if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to
>> figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about
>> this kernel version.)
>
> We'll pull it into rt and figure out what breaks.

Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset
development for 2.6.38 and on?
It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap
between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before...
Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ?

Thanks for the all the effort,

Kind regards,

Remy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux