RE: 2.6.18-rt7 on HP Z800

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 08:27 +0100, Simpson, John (UK) (Contractor)
wrote:
> For info. I can't get my HP Z800 to boot with 2.6.24-rt1

try the last of the .24s not the first

Sven

>  or with a
> vanilla 2.6.33.5. (kernel panic after various combinations of not
> finding logical volumes etc.) It's running adequately with 2.6.18-rt7. I
> suspect some weirdness with the LSI SAS1068E (PCI-Express Fusion-MPT
> SAS) disk controller, but frankly I'm clueless and leaving this in case
> it might be relevant to someone else's problems.
> 
> J  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich [mailto:sven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 05 August 2010 09:50
> To: Simpson, John (UK) (Contractor)
> Cc: linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rt7 on HP Z800
> 
> On 08/05/2010 01:09 AM, Simpson, John (UK) (Contractor) wrote:
> >  
> > I've had no response to this question. Can anyone help? I'm also 
> > baffled as to why the smp_affinity stuff doesn't work.
> >
> >   
> 
> 2.6.18. So that was as Pi was being merged, but HRT wasn't merged yet?
> 
> 
> And NVIDIA didn't care about RT, that really didn't happen till MRG.
> 
> And there was also work being done on cpusets at the time.
> 
> To say the least, you have a lifetime's worth of back-porting to do.
> 
> I would suggest referencing a MontaVista 2.6.18 Kernel for your bug
> fixes.
> Deepak was still there and did a good job keeping up with the patches.
> 
> Next option, move to 2.6.24, that was VERY well tested, and by then the
> cpu shielding business was getting mainstream, and all the things you
> mention should work pretty well.
> 
> I for one spent 3 years of my life bogged on a 2.6.22RT Kernel, and am
> sure glad to be done with that.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> Sven
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-rt-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:linux-rt-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simpson, 
> > John
> > (UK) (Contractor)
> > Sent: 04 August 2010 09:30
> > To: linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: 2.6.18-rt7 on HP Z800
> >
> >
> >                *** WARNING ***
> >
> > This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an 
> > external partner or the Global Internet.
> >      Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 
> >
> > As previously posted, I'm using 2.6.18 for compatibility with third 
> > party drivers for an FPGA card. This a scene-generation app using an 
> > Nvidia Quadro FX5800 requiring a high-frame rate with no dropped 
> > frames; hence the need for RT (we've had previous success using 
> > proprietary stuff but thought we'd give this a go).
> >  
> > It's working fine (with very occasional crashes, most of which seem to
> 
> > have been referred to in later RT kernel fixes, but we can put up with
> 
> > it).
> >  
> > Some notes for posterity:
> >  
> >     Turn off irqbalance service
> >     Deselect power management stuff in kernel
> >     Select SATA IDE emulation in BIOS (otherwise no SCSI/CD stuff)
> >     Rebuilt Broadcom tg3 and set pci=nomsi for network drivers to 
> > function
> >     isolcpus used on boot
> >     App run on isolated cpus using 'taskset'
> >         
> > Like I said, it works fine, I haven't seen any dropped frames yet, but
> 
> > there's stuff I don't understand from using other RT OSs...
> >  
> >     All interrupts run on CPU0, all the time, there's no requirement 
> > to use smp_affinity, in fact if you do the whole thing grinds to a 
> > halt.  I guess this is fine.
> >     The isolcpus option seems to work fine except for the following 
> > running on all eight CPUs:
> >         migration
> >         posix_cpu_timer
> >         softirq-high
> >         softirq-timer
> >         softirq-net-tx
> >         softirq-net-rx
> >         softirq-block
> >         softirq-tasklet
> >         softirq-hrtimer
> >         softirq-rcu
> >         watchdog
> >         desched
> >         aio
> >         cqueue
> >         kblockd
> >         events
> >  
> >     I guess this is preemptible stuff which must run per cpu, but 
> > there's a bit in a Red Hat page 
> > http://rt.et.redhat.com/wiki/index.php?title=RHEL-RT_AffinityHowto&pri
> > nt able=yes (starting "In MRG Realtime") which apparently refers to 
> > these elements in their RT kernel suggesting that these should be 
> > dealt with (but then doesn't seem to say how).  Do I need to do 
> > anything about these processes?
> >  
> > Thanks
> >  
> > John
> >  
> >
> > ********************************************************************
> > This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended 
> > recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
> > recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You
> 
> > should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or 
> > distribute its contents to any other person.
> >
> > MBDA UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, 
> > registration number 3144919 whose registered office is at Six Hills 
> > Way, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2DA, England.
> > ********************************************************************
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> > linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> > linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >   
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux