Re: PREEMPT_RT patch vs RTAI/Xenomai

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Armin Steinhoff wrote:

If tuned properly, PREEMPT_RT can easily handle 1ms requirements. On a
standard x86 CPU (we support others than x86) our goal is never to be

I did a test with user space based CAN driver.
Already the standard distribution of SUSE 11.2 (non RT) was able to handle 1000 frames per seconds sent by a QNX6 machine !!

If your requirements are "never to exceed" a certain latency,
I highly recommend you run tests for long-durations, rather
than a short period. A 10-min or even a 1 hour run will not
give you a full idea as a 24-72 hour run will.

The PREEMPT_RT version of SUSE 11.2 is much, much faster :-)
over 100us in reaction time.

The latency test of PREEMPT_RT shows a latency of ~10us for a dual-core box at 1.8GHz.

Are you using cyclictest? And how long did you run it for?


thanks,
Nivedita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux