Re: RFC: NUMA modifications to cyclictest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:23:35 +0300
> "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > > The big difference here is that when using --numa, each measurement
>> > > thread (one per cpu) has it's stack allocated from the memory node
>> > > associated with it's cpu. Also, the major data structures for each
>> > > thread (parameter block, statistics block and histogram) are allocated
>> > > from the appropriate node. This is done with calls into libnuma,
>> > > which means this will add a dependency on libnuma.
>> >
>> > That might cause some trouble for embedded folks. :(
>>
>> Maybe make that a compile-time option?
>
> Yeah, I'm beginning to think I need to pull out the autoconf book :(
>
> Clark
>

compile-time option does not equal autoconf. Please, no autoconf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux