Re: RFC: NUMA modifications to cyclictest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:23:35 +0300
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > The big difference here is that when using --numa, each measurement
> > > thread (one per cpu) has it's stack allocated from the memory node
> > > associated with it's cpu. Also, the major data structures for each
> > > thread (parameter block, statistics block and histogram) are allocated
> > > from the appropriate node. This is done with calls into libnuma,
> > > which means this will add a dependency on libnuma.
> >
> > That might cause some trouble for embedded folks. :(
> 
> Maybe make that a compile-time option?

Yeah, I'm beginning to think I need to pull out the autoconf book :(

Clark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux