Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> > The statistics stuff needs to be tackled anyway as we need to offload
> > the sched accounting to some other cpu.
> 
> The vm statisticcs in mm/vmstat.c are different from the sched accounting.

I know, but the problem is basically the same. Delegate the stats to
someone else.
 
> > What slab queue stuff is running on timers and cannot be switched off
> > in such a context?
> 
> slab does run a timer every 2 second to age queues. If there was activity
> then there can be a relatively long time in which we periodically throw
> out portions of the cached data.

Right, but why does that affect a CPU which is marked "I'm not
involved in that game" ?
 
> > Device specific stuff should not happen on such a CPU when there is no
> > device handled on it.
> 
> The device may periodically check for conditions that require action.

Errm. The device is associated to some other CPU, so why would it
require action on an isolated one ? Or are you talking about a device
which is associated to that isolated CPU ?

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux