On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:15 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 08/26/2009 02:50 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > What problem? > > > > All I've seen is "I want 100% access to a CPU". That's not a problem > > statement - it's an implementation. > > > > What is the problem statement? > > I can only speak for myself... > > In our case the problem statement was that we had an inherently > single-threaded emulator app that we wanted to push as hard as > absolutely possible. > > We gave it as close to a whole cpu as we could using cpu and irq > affinity and we used message queues in shared memory to allow another > cpu to handle I/O. In our case we still had kernel threads running on > the app cpu, but if we'd had a straightforward way to avoid them we > would have used it. > > Chris Chris. I offer myself to help anyone wishes to apply OFFSCHED. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
