On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter has not given a solution to the problem. Nor have you. What problem? All I've seen is "I want 100% access to a CPU". That's not a problem statement - it's an implementation. What is the problem statement? My take on these patches: the kernel gives userspace unmediated access to memory resources if it wants that. The kernel gives userspace unmediated access to IO devices if it wants that. But for some reason people freak out at the thought of providing unmediated access to CPU resources. Don't get all religious about this. If the change is clean, maintainable and useful then there's no reason to not merge it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
