On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:40:09 -0400 (EDT) > Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Peter has not given a solution to the problem. Nor have you. > > What problem? > > All I've seen is "I want 100% access to a CPU". That's not a problem > statement - it's an implementation. > > What is the problem statement? > > > My take on these patches: the kernel gives userspace unmediated access > to memory resources if it wants that. The kernel gives userspace > unmediated access to IO devices if it wants that. But for some reason > people freak out at the thought of providing unmediated access to CPU > resources. > > Don't get all religious about this. If the change is clean, > maintainable and useful then there's no reason to not merge it. thank you Mr Morton. thank you !!! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
