Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes: > [...] > >> Don't get all religious about this. If the change is clean, >> maintainable and useful then there's no reason to not merge it. > Precisely. This feature as proposed here hinders the correct > solution being implemented - and hence hurts long term > maintainability and hence is a no-merge right now. (Does it "hinder" this in any different way than the following, as in possibly reducing "pressure" for it?) > [It also weakens the pressure to fix latencies for a much wider set > of applications, hence hurts the quality of Linux in the long > run. (i.e. is a net step backwards)] How would you differentiate the above sentiment from "perfect is the enemy of the good"? - FChE -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
