Re: RFC for a new Scheduling policy/class in the Linux-kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Raistlin wrote:
Also, I'm not sure I can find in the FMLP paper information about the
possibility of a task to suspend itself (e.g., I/O completion) while
holding a short lock... I assume this is not recommended, but may be
wrong, and, in that case, I hope Prof. Anderson and Bjorn will excuse
and correct me. :-)

This is a really excellent point and something I probably should have mentioned. We developed the FMLP strictly for real-time (only) workloads. We were specifically looking at protecting memory-resident resources (not I/O). The FMLP would have to be significantly extended to work in settings where these assumptions don't hold.

Thanks for pointing this out.

-Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux