Re: real-time priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rodrigo Amestica wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> general questions from somebody who's just starting to look into the
> preempt patch.
> 
> the article linked below makes direct reference to the behavior of the

The link is missing.


> preempt rt patch. The article was written in 2007. How much of that
> still holds true in the current version of the patch?
> 
> I'm basically wondering about the first sentences in the abstract of
> that article. The big picture seems to be rather simple: calls to
> specific linux services could break the performance of a real time task
> by depending on lower priority tasks to complete that service.
> 
> Does this mean that one must always be alert to which system services
> are invoked during the execution of a real time task? Does the vanilla
> kernel or the preempt-rt patch tries to somehow detect this condition
> and alert somehow?
> 
> thanks,
> Rodrigo
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux