Re: 2.6.29-rc bug near nf_conntrack_tuple_taken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> This would mean something has used the non-rcu list functions
> when removing a conntrack from the hash. Which I don't see
> happening anywhere. Another possibility would be that the connntrack
> was already confirmed when the tuple got mangled and the list
> got corrupted. The pr_debug in nf_conntrack_alter_reply should
> trigger in that case.

Don't worry, that's a fallout of -rt, which is fixed in 2.6.29-rc6-rt3
already.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux