Re: cyclictest - trouble explaning results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jens Wirth <jewirth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oleg Galimov <Galimov <at> gmx.de> writes:
>
>> I have a dual-core cpu. When I run cyclictest on both cores and then start a
> time hog (like cp /dev/zero
>> /dev/null), then the average latency on the core where it runs goes down
> significantly (on my machine it is
>> like 30us before and 10us after, when using rt-patch). It returns to the
> original values, when I kill the cp process.
>
> I made a similar observation while measuring the jitter in
> the time of execution of usleep(). The more load the machine
> has the less becomes the average jitter. Of course, there is
> a point of inflection when the system is fully stretched.
>
> I observed this behavior on a ppc405 based embedded system
> (no SMP) with and without CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. Interestingly
> enough, I was unable to reproduce your observation with the
> cyclictest tool on this system.

I have to correct myself: When running multiple threads I get the
same behavior as you described. Remarkably, this is a single core
system with a fixed cpu frequency.

Jens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux