On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 00:20 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > So, what's protecting the RT kernel from falling over if a CPU frequency > governor module is removed at the wrong moment? That's a contrived example, it does the right thing in the ones I've looked it, but it just occurred to me that this might not be general for kernel code where random pointers to modules are getting thrown around. Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
