Yo, Ok...so I might just be missing something and you guys will set me right if that is indeed the case, but... What's protecting the -RT kernel from assumptions about atomicity of module symbol references? Specifically, the kernel doesn't normally need to protect against inter-module symbol references to EXPORT_SYMBOL(s), however, it requires special protection when a function pointer is being passed around - that's why we use things like try_module_get. But it is assumed that it is ok not to do this in atomic contexts. So, what's protecting the RT kernel from falling over if a CPU frequency governor module is removed at the wrong moment? Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
