Priority Ceiling for SMP?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi!

I'm thinking about adding the priority ceiling protocol to -rt
(implemented in a way so that you can select between priority
inheritance and priority ceiling with the kernel configurator).

Since this mechanism inherently avoids dead-locks, it could be
helpful for applications that need high safety integrity levels!?

The priority ceiling protocol is basically no rocket science
and implemented for other OSes for a while, so it should be
a no-brainer get it going with Linux. However. I'm struggling
at the point where it comes to SMP: it seems like when a task
acquires a lock, it is necessary to un-schedule any active
tasks on other cores sharing the same lock. This would be
very inefficient, of course, because tasks sharing a lock
couldn't run in parallel on different CPUs.

Does anybody know of any other priority inversion and
dead-lock avoidance mechanism that would efficiently work
on SMP?

Feedback is highly appreciated!

regards

Bernhard

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux