Re: 2.6.23-rc9-rt2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by this, since interrupt handlers are run as
> > threads and are fully preemptible.
> >
> I think by nested or reentrant interrupt handling technique you can
> further reduce latencies.
> what you think.

Interrupt handlers in vanilla Linux and preempt-rt are never reentrant. 
There is no advantage of allowing interrupt handler reentrancy, quite the 
contrary it makes the code more complex.

The interrupt handlers in preempt-rt are running in threads. One thread 
per interrupt, so depending on the thread priority the handlers a handler 
of one interrupt can preempt the running handler of another interrupt.

> Can we can get guaranteed realtime throughput by using these realtime patch.

Realtime is not about throughput. It's about determinism.

	tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux