Re: Cyclictest expected results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:55:09AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:20:29PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
| > 
| > But I am not able to see performance difference in my GNOME
| > Environment. It is still very very slow, how can I boost X-Windows by
| > -rt patch.
| 
| There are many reasons why GNOME performance might be slow.  Stupid
| application design going to helped by some magic kernel patch.  Keep
| in mind the GNOME doesn't run with real-time priority levels; neither
| does the X server.  
| 
| The -rt patch isn't magic; no RTOS is magic.  A large amount of
| application design and reworking in order to properly utilize the
| POSIX real-time interfaces.

Also keep in mind that by its very nature, -rt is more sensible to bad
coding and bad application design. Some applications that perform well in
mainstream linux may present bugs in -rt (those bugs exist in the code but
are more prone to show uo in -rt).

People here have been working most of time focused on determinism.
Eventually it comes with a performance enhancement bonus. Sometimes not.

Luis
-- 
[ Luis Claudio R. Goncalves                    Bass - Gospel - RT ]
[ Fingerprint: 4FDD B8C4 3C59 34BD 8BE9  2696 7203 D980 A448 C8F8 ]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux