Hello Robert, On 10/8/07, Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:20:29PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > I am also getting : > > root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 -q > > T: 0 ( 2709) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 8 Act: 16 Avg: 16 Max: 44 > > [root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -i 10000 -l 10000 -q > > T: 0 ( 2723) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 21 Act: 30 Avg: 29 Max: 139 > > [root@rd cycletest]# > > Doesn't look too bad. > > > I am quite strange why I start getting RT performance with ACPI. why I > > need ACPI on my PC, I dont even use ACPI on my Laptop. > > acpi_pm provides a proper clocksource to your system which is a) sane > and b) has enough resolution. > > > But I am not able to see performance difference in my GNOME > > Environment. It is still very very slow, how can I boost X-Windows by > > -rt patch. > > I'm not sure what you are expecting here? Realtime is about guaranteed > latencies, not about speed. > Currently my GNOME environment takes 150 seconds to start. May be it because of some bug : mtrr: base(0xf0020000) is not aligned on a size(0x300000) boundary [drm:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 2382 using kernel context 0 I am just curious can we improve its performance by Realtime. Yes, you are right we cannot do anything if CPU is already running 100%. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
