Re: Cyclictest expected results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 06:20:29PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> I am also getting :
> root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 -q
> T: 0 ( 2709) P:80 I:10000 C:  10000 Min:      8 Act:   16 Avg:   16 Max:      44
> [root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -i 10000 -l 10000 -q
> T: 0 ( 2723) P:80 I:10000 C:  10000 Min:     21 Act:   30 Avg:   29 Max:     139
> [root@rd cycletest]#

Doesn't look too bad.

> I am quite strange why I start getting RT performance with ACPI. why I
> need ACPI on my PC, I dont even use ACPI on my Laptop.

acpi_pm provides a proper clocksource to your system which is a) sane
and b) has enough resolution.

> But I am not able to see performance difference in my GNOME
> Environment. It is still very very slow, how can I boost X-Windows by
> -rt patch.

I'm not sure what you are expecting here? Realtime is about guaranteed
latencies, not about speed.

Robert
-- 
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Entwicklungszentrum Nord     http://www.pengutronix.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux