Re: [PATCH 2/3] proc-interrupts-missing-vectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:51:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> we cannot really change the format of /proc/interrupts, tools might rely 
> on it - i undid previous -rt changes to the format. An acceptable 
> approach would be to introduce a new /proc/irq_debug file and put all 
> this (and other) information into it.

Well, changes that are additions (that is, those that don't
change the position of existing fields or just add new
lines) are noticibly less invasive than ones that rearrange
fields or insert new fields between existing ones.

In any case, we've been using this patch for 4-5 yrs
without ill effect.

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux