* Joe Korty <joe.korty@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add missing IRQs to /proc/interrupts. > > /proc/interrupts is not truly useful unless it displays every IRQ > vector, not just those somebody thought would be interesting. For > example, since the default /proc/interrupts setup did not display the > rescheduling interrupt, the occurance of rescheduling interrupt floods > ends up affecting latencies, yet without an entry in /proc/interrupts, > it is difficult to discern why latencies are being affected. > > Also does a silly little expansion of the 'ERR:' display to be per > cpu. This makes its layout identical to all the other display lines > in /proc/interrupts. we cannot really change the format of /proc/interrupts, tools might rely on it - i undid previous -rt changes to the format. An acceptable approach would be to introduce a new /proc/irq_debug file and put all this (and other) information into it. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
