On Tuesday 24 July 2007 14:14:19 Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:59:05PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > We were trying to avoid libraries in a futile effort to keep the make > > process simple.... ah well. This doesn't complicate things at all > > really it turns out, so I'm fine with it. > > That's why I made it static libs - that's simple and works without > libtool. > > > > Note: the libs should really be renamed, because calling a local > > > library "librt" is a very, very bad idea. > > > > Agreed. We were thinking of changing it to librttest - any other > > suggestions? > > Sounds good. You should also think about taking it out of include/ and > put it into something like lib/ or libs/. Agreed, they started out as just header files - but they evolved into the static libraries they are now - time to rename and move them indeed. -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Realtime Linux Team - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
