On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:59:05PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > We were trying to avoid libraries in a futile effort to keep the make > process simple.... ah well. This doesn't complicate things at all > really it turns out, so I'm fine with it. That's why I made it static libs - that's simple and works without libtool. > > Note: the libs should really be renamed, because calling a local library > > "librt" is a very, very bad idea. > > Agreed. We were thinking of changing it to librttest - any other suggestions? Sounds good. You should also think about taking it out of include/ and put it into something like lib/ or libs/. Robert -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
