Hi Heiko,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:45:10
+0100:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The lvds controller has two ports. port@0 for the connection
> to the display controller(s) and port@1 for the connection to
> the panel, so should have a ports node covering the port@x nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> index 9b1c92132007..37e014444214 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> @@ -421,19 +421,24 @@ lvds: lvds {
> rockchip,output = "lvds";
> status = "disabled";
>
> - port@0 {
> - reg = <0>;
> + ports {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> - lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 {
> + port@0 {
> reg = <0>;
> - remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>;
> - };
> -
> - lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 {
> - reg = <1>;
> - remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>;
> + };
> +
> + lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>;
> + };
> };
> };
> };
I don't know the exact rule but this seems cleaner indeed.
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
