пн, 30 дек. 2019 г. в 11:59, Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:11 PM Matwey V. Kornilov > <matwey.kornilov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for the patch set. > > Currently, I have the following concern about documentation and > > overall proposed u-boot deploy procedure. > > > > There is a use case, when I have to use Rockchip proprietary TPL > > binary and deploy it instead of u-boot's one together with u-boot SPL > > and ITB images. > > It is required for debugging purposes because unfortunately u-boot TPL > > is usually less stable that proprietary one. And switching the TPL > > binary is basically the first step when I see random strange crashes. > > It is a good way to locate an issue origin. > > > > Could we somehow ensure that this backup deployment plan is still > > possible and documented in the text here? It would be great if the > > user could learn the procedure from the text, not from the source > > code, recovering correct offsets. > > You mean to say rkbin => SPL => U-Boot proper ? if yes, I do agree Yes, I mean so. I think it would be great to have something like the section describing where do the things came from and the layout which is under the hood. > with this point and it is worth to document it as well. Kever, will > that be okay for you? > > Jagan. -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
