Hi, On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:11 PM Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you for the patch set. > Currently, I have the following concern about documentation and > overall proposed u-boot deploy procedure. > > There is a use case, when I have to use Rockchip proprietary TPL > binary and deploy it instead of u-boot's one together with u-boot SPL > and ITB images. > It is required for debugging purposes because unfortunately u-boot TPL > is usually less stable that proprietary one. And switching the TPL > binary is basically the first step when I see random strange crashes. > It is a good way to locate an issue origin. > > Could we somehow ensure that this backup deployment plan is still > possible and documented in the text here? It would be great if the > user could learn the procedure from the text, not from the source > code, recovering correct offsets. You mean to say rkbin => SPL => U-Boot proper ? if yes, I do agree with this point and it is worth to document it as well. Kever, will that be okay for you? Jagan. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
