Hi Rob, On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 09:53 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:48 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > The function now is safe to use while expecting a 64bit value. Use it > > where relevant. > > What was wrong with the existing code? This is missing some context. You're right, I'll update it. For most of files changed the benefit here is factoring out a common pattern using the standard function roundup/down_pow_two() which now provides correct 64bit results. As for of/device.c and arm64/iort.c it's more of a readability enhancement. I consider it's easier to understand than the current calculation as it abstracts the math. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c | 3 ++- > > drivers/of/device.c | 3 ++- > > In any case, > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks! Regards, Nicolas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
