On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:48 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > The function now is safe to use while expecting a 64bit value. Use it > where relevant. What was wrong with the existing code? This is missing some context. > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c | 3 ++- > drivers/of/device.c | 3 ++- In any case, Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 3 ++- > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c | 3 ++- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 3 ++- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 5 +++-- > kernel/dma/direct.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
