On 18/11/2019 12:52 am, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. November 2019, 13:47:19 CET schrieb Robin Murphy:
Although it appeared to follow logically from the bindings, apparently
the thermal framework can't properly cope with a single cooling device
being shared between multiple maps. The CPU zone is probably easier to
overheat, so remove the references to the (optional) fan from the GPU
cooling zone to avoid things getting confused. Hopefully GPU-intensive
tasks will leak enough heat across to the CPU zone to still hit the
fan trips before reaching critical GPU temperatures.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
applied, after little bit of editing.
&i2s0 {
status = "okay";
};
although my nano-pc dts does not seem to have that &i2s0 node yet.
Did I miss a patch somewhere?
Oops, no, my fault - there were more changes in the middle of my local
branch which I thought were entirely orthogonal. I should have checked
the diff context more closely... thanks for cleaning it up!
Robin.
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
