On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:54:20PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Null checks are both cheaper and more readable than having !IS_ERR() > splattered everywhere. > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3)) > + if (!rockchip->vpcie3v3) > return; > > /* > @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip) > if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) != -ENODEV) > return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v); > dev_info(dev, "no vpcie12v regulator found\n"); > + rockchip->vpcie12v = NULL; According to the API NULL is a valid regulator. We don't currently actually do this but it's storing up surprises if you treat it as invalid.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
