On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:43 PM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:56:39 +0530 > > > > Hi Kever, > > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:26 PM Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Jagan, > > > > > > > > > On 2019/10/18 上午3:07, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > idbloader.img name is specific to rockchip, > > > > > > This is specific for rockchip, like rksd, rkspi type in mkimage, since > > > it's clear for what it stands for, > > > > > > I think it can also used in U-Boot. > > > > > > > where it usually > > > > created using rockchip tools. > > > > > > > > > No, idbloader stands for the image with idb header packaged with two > > > stage loader, eg. TPL+SPL > > > > > > or ddr.bin+miniloader.bin, and maybe ddr.bin + SPL， TPL+miniloader.bin, > > > > > > not related to rockchip tools, it can also be created with U-Boot > > > mkimage tool. > > > > I understand what idbloader contains, it is like rockchip SPL. but the > > main concern here is the naming convention used in U-Boot. It would be > > a standard way of using naming conventions where the final output > > naming conventions should have u-boot support stages(TPL, SPL, U-Boot) > > and platform specific name. This way it is less confused what exactly > > it contains. > > > > Moreover most of the platform specific bin ended up using this type of > > conventions. > > > > - u-boot-spl-mtk.bin - Mediatek SPL bin > > - u-boot-mtk.bin - Mediatek U-Boot bin (would be final image) > > - u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin - Allwinner U-Boot with SPL > > - u-boot-x86-start16-tpl.bin > > No real consistency there though... Not sure what you pointed here, each bin listed above shows the platform and u-boot stage and prefix with u-boot- as well. of course all can't maintain the same but has mentioned details. > > > Similar naming conventions used for tegra, x86 etc. > > > > I'm completely aware of what you're trying to abbreviate > > idbloader.img, but having u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin is more readable and > > understand than idbloader. > > As was discussed before, idbloader.img is the name used in external > documentation. Yes, used in external documentation. when it comes to upstream it would follow as per existing platforms does atleast. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
