Hi, Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2019, 13:42:20 CEST schrieb Leonidas P. Papadakos: > > Hi, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2019, 01:57:13 CEST schrieb Leonidas P. > > Papadakos: > >> From: <itdaniher@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Why is the From different from the Signed-off-by? Would also need a > > full name. > > If the patch is from you, please just use the same From as for the > > Signed-off-by. > > > > I mistakenly though this was the way to credit someone for a patch, but > it seems to be different. > I'll Cc: the author of this patch Were you able yet to take a look at the clock-patches I Cc'ed you on and look at reworking your patch accrodingly? Thanks Heiko > > >> > >> Following the discussion here: > >> https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/issues/123 > >> > >> it can be seen that these are the changes needed to enable the use > >> of the hardware watchdog in the rk3328 SoC. > >> > >> This is in line with past changes for the rk3288: > >> > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2015-January/002314.html > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Leonidas P. Papadakos <papadakospan@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3328.c | 9 +++++++++ > >> include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3328-cru.h | 1 + > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3328.c > >> b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3328.c > >> index 076b9777a..546ee0ab7 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3328.c > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3328.c > >> @@ -876,6 +876,8 @@ static const char *const > >> rk3328_critical_clocks[] __initconst = { > >> > >> static void __init rk3328_clk_init(struct device_node *np) > >> { > >> + struct clk *clk; > >> + > >> struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx; > >> void __iomem *reg_base; > >> > >> @@ -892,6 +894,13 @@ static void __init rk3328_clk_init(struct > >> device_node *np) > >> return; > >> } > >> > >> + clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pclk_wdt", "pclk_bus", 0, > >> 1, 1); > >> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) > >> + pr_warn("%s: could not register clock pclk_wdt: %ld\n", > >> + __func__, PTR_ERR(clk)); > >> + else > >> + rockchip_clk_add_lookup(ctx, clk, PCLK_WDT); > >> + > > > > I've just Cc'ed you on 2 patches adding a SGRF_GATE clock-type. Please > > use that as base for you rk3328-wdt-clock, so that we don't introduce > > more > > boilderplate code. > > > > > >> rockchip_clk_register_plls(ctx, rk3328_pll_clks, > >> ARRAY_SIZE(rk3328_pll_clks), > >> RK3328_GRF_SOC_STATUS0); > > > >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3328-cru.h > >> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3328-cru.h > >> index afb811340..555b4ff66 100644 > >> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3328-cru.h > >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3328-cru.h > >> @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ > >> #define PCLK_DCF 233 > >> #define PCLK_SARADC 234 > >> #define PCLK_ACODECPHY 235 > >> +#define PCLK_WDT 236 > >> > >> /* hclk gates */ > >> #define HCLK_PERI 308 > > > > please split the addition of the clock-id into a separate patch only > > adding > > said id. > > > > > > Thanks > > Heiko > > > > I know less than him on this, but I want the feedback to be visible in > the Cc: > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
