On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:27 PM Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14:29-20190109, Rob Herring wrote: > > The 'arm,armv8' compatible string is only for software models. It adds > > little value otherwise and is inconsistently used as a fallback on some > > platforms. Remove it from those platforms. > > > > This fixes warnings generated by the DT schema. > > > > Reported-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > [...] > > ARM SoC maintainers, At least on a quick look (I could be wrong), I > think we don't have any explicit processor bindings documentation. bindings/arm/cpus.yaml > However, most of SoC folks seem to key off matches else where I > guess.. > > Not sure, while at this, you if you are planning on fixing up > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm-boards: > compatible = "arm,cortex-a53","arm,armv8"; > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt: > compatible = "arm,cortex-a53","arm,armv8"; I'll handle documentation separately. Rob _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
