Hi Heiko,
On 2016?03?09? 20:29, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Hi Xing,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 9. M?rz 2016, 10:42:58 schrieb Xing Zheng:
>> The rk3399's pll and clock are similar with rk3036's, it different
>> with base on the rk3066(rk3188, rk3288, rk3368 use it), there are
>> different adjust foctors and control registers, so these should be
>> independent and separate from the series of rk3066s.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 279
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h |
>> 3 +-
>> 2 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
>> index 27be66a..62d2f0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
>> @@ -593,6 +593,275 @@ static const struct clk_ops
>> rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = { .init = rockchip_rk3066_pll_init,
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * PLL used in RK3399
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON(i) (i * 0x4)
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_MASK 0xfff
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_SHIFT 0
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_REFDIV_MASK 0x3f
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV1_MASK 0x7
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV1_SHIFT 8
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 12
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0
> please move RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS here
Done.
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_MASK 0x1
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_SHIFT 12
> DSMPD_SHIFT should be 3, right?
Yes, I'm sorry to careless.
>
>> +
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS (31 << 0)
> that is wrong, you want (1 << 31), or even better BIT(31) here
Yes, done.
>
>> +#define RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN (1 << 0)
> dito, BIT(0) please
Done.
>> +static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long
>> drate, + unsigned long prate)
>> +{
>> + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
>> + const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
>> + unsigned long old_rate = rockchip_rk3399_pll_recalc_rate(hw, prate);
>> + struct regmap *grf = rockchip_clk_get_grf(pll->ctx);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(grf)) {
>> + pr_debug("%s: grf regmap not available, aborting rate change\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + return PTR_ERR(grf);
>> + }
> the pll lock-status moved to the pll registers it seems, so you don't need to
> get the GRF here at all, as we don't need it for the lock status.
Yes, done.
Thanks.
--
- Xing Zheng
