Hi Xing,
Am Mittwoch, 9. M?rz 2016, 10:42:58 schrieb Xing Zheng:
> The rk3399's pll and clock are similar with rk3036's, it different
> with base on the rk3066(rk3188, rk3288, rk3368 use it), there are
> different adjust foctors and control registers, so these should be
> independent and separate from the series of rk3066s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 279
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h |
> 3 +-
> 2 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> index 27be66a..62d2f0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
> @@ -593,6 +593,275 @@ static const struct clk_ops
> rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = { .init = rockchip_rk3066_pll_init,
> };
>
> +/**
> + * PLL used in RK3399
> + */
> +
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON(i) (i * 0x4)
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_MASK 0xfff
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_SHIFT 0
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_REFDIV_MASK 0x3f
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV1_MASK 0x7
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV1_SHIFT 8
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 12
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0
please move RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS here
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_MASK 0x1
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_SHIFT 12
DSMPD_SHIFT should be 3, right?
> +
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS (31 << 0)
that is wrong, you want (1 << 31), or even better BIT(31) here
> +#define RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN (1 << 0)
dito, BIT(0) please
[...]
> +static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long
> drate, + unsigned long prate)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
> + const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
> + unsigned long old_rate = rockchip_rk3399_pll_recalc_rate(hw, prate);
> + struct regmap *grf = rockchip_clk_get_grf(pll->ctx);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(grf)) {
> + pr_debug("%s: grf regmap not available, aborting rate change\n",
> + __func__);
> + return PTR_ERR(grf);
> + }
the pll lock-status moved to the pll registers it seems, so you don't need to
get the GRF here at all, as we don't need it for the lock status.
Heiko
