On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:47:01PM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote: > On 2016?06?07? 20:06, Mark Brown wrote: > > OK, then the original name probably makes some sense though really > > that's such an unusual design that just naming it after the specific > > board might be better, it's not likely to see any reuse I'd guess. > There are not only one type of board with this audio connection, so I think > we don't need to add specific board name. I imagine they're all variants on a single reference design though? The name is unweildy. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20160607/5e7b555c/attachment.sig>
