Hi Mark,
On 2016?06?07? 20:06, Mark Brown wrote:
> OK, then the original name probably makes some sense though really
> that's such an unusual design that just naming it after the specific
> board might be better, it's not likely to see any reuse I'd guess.
There are not only one type of board with this audio connection, so I
think we don't need to add specific board name.
Therefore, I intend to recover original name
(rk3399_max98357a_rt5514_da7219.c), and description like this:
sound {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219";
rockchip,cpu = <&i2s0 &i2s0 &i2s0>; // note (will not
be sent to upstream): In future, we may use the i2s1 or i2s2...
rockchip,codec = <&max98357a &headsetcodec &codec>;
};
Could you please agree to do this?
Thanks.
--
- Xing Zheng
