Hi Mark
? 17/02/2016 19:46, Mark Rutland ??:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:01:16AM +0800, jianqun.xu wrote:
>> From: Xu Jianqun <jay.xu at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> Add dtsi file for Rockchip rk3399 SoCs, which includes some
>> general nodes such as cpu, pmu, cru, gic, amba and so on.
>>
>> Change-Id: Ie3b824e8ead967d4cb119d73222b7a198478c29c
>
> This is meaningless upstream. Please remove any "Change-Id" lines from
> upstream commit messages.
ok, next version will remove them. thanks
>
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Jianqun <jay.xu at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 989 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 989 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..eb671f6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,989 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2016 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
>> + *
>> + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
>> + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
>> + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
>> + * whole.
>> + *
>> + * a) This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
>> + * License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * Or, alternatively,
>> + *
>> + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
>> + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
>> + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
>> + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
>> + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
>> + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
>> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
>> + * conditions:
>> + *
>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
>> + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
>> + *
>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
>> + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
>> + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
>> + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
>> + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
>> + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
>> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
>> + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> + */
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + aliases {
>> + serial0 = &uart0;
>> + serial1 = &uart1;
>> + serial2 = &uart2;
>> + serial3 = &uart3;
>> + };
>> +
>> + psci {
>> + compatible = "arm,psci";
>> + method = "smc";
>> + };
>
> That compatible string alone is insufficient, as it implies no
> particular function IDs. Hotplug and idle cannot possibly work.
>
> Have you tested this DT?
Yes, but only the simple system now, more function IDs will be added later.
>
> Which PSCI version have you implemented? Are you using a standard
> firmware (e.g. ARM Trusted Firmware), or some custom implementation?
>
>> + cpu_l0: cpu at 0 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&cpu_sleep>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>
>> + cpu_b0: cpu at 100 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a72", "arm,armv8";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x100>;
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&cpu_sleep>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>
>> + pmu {
>> + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> + interrupt-affinity = <&cpu_l0>, <&cpu_l1>, <&cpu_l2>,
>> + <&cpu_l3>, <&cpu_b0>, <&cpu_b1>;
>> + };
>> +
>
> This isn't quite right. We should have separate nodes for the A72 and
> A53 PMUs.
>
> We can't describe that just yet due to needing cluster-local PPIs. I
> believe Will was looking into that.
>
> In the mean time, please drop the PMU node.
ok, next version will drop the pmu node first, someone will add them in
another patch.
>
>> + timer {
>> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
>> + interrupts =
>> + <GIC_PPI 13
>> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
>> + <GIC_PPI 14
>> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
>> + <GIC_PPI 11
>> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
>> + <GIC_PPI 10
>> + (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
>> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>> + };
>
> Please fix your firmware to program CNTFRQ. Using clock-frequency is
> really not sufficient, and new platforms have no excuse for not having
> it programmed correctly.
ok, I will fix it. thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>
>
