On 10/31/2015 12:47 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: >> On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> ? 2015?10?01? 03:14, Heiko St?bner ??: >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: >>>>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: >>>>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform, >>>>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip. >>>>>> >>>>>> Says: >>>>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand >>>>>> 1 -- >>>>>> `dsb` >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64, >>>>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param >>>>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and >>>>>> dsb(sy) >>>>>> are the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com> >>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> >>>> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them >>>> to go >>>> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right? >>> >>> I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-) >>> In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:- >> >> Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go >> through another tree. > > although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go > through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second > one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case > for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well? Ok, I will take the two first patches through my tree. Thanks -- Daniel -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
