On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > ? 2015?10?01? 03:14, Heiko St?bner ??: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: >>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: >>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform, >>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip. >>>> >>>> Says: >>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand >>>> 1 -- >>>> `dsb` >>>> ... >>>> >>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64, >>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param >>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and >>>> dsb(sy) >>>> are the same. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com> >>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> >> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them >> to go >> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right? > > I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-) > In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:- Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go through another tree. I suggest before sending patches you read carefully the file Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Especially, 11), 12) and 13). Thanks. -- Daniel -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
