On 11/16/2015 05:55 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:10:40 +0900
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> W dniu 16.11.2015 o 17:56, Boris Brezillon pisze:
>>> Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
>>> Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
>>> update.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
>>>
>>> --->8---
>>> virtual patch
>>>
>>> @@
>>> struct pwm_device *p;
>>> expression e;
>>> @@
>>> (
>>> -(p)->polarity = e;
>>> +pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
>>> |
>>> -(p)->polarity
>>> +pwm_get_polarity((p))
>>> |
>>> -(p)->period = e;
>>> +pwm_set_period((p), e);
>>> |
>>> -(p)->period
>>> +pwm_get_period((p))
>>> |
>>> -(p)->duty_cycle = e;
>>> +pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);
>>> |
>>> -(p)->duty_cycle
>>> +pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))
>>> )
>>> --->8---
>>> ---
>>> drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c | 7 ++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
>>> index 6d96bff..a038fb3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
>>> @@ -70,10 +70,11 @@ struct max77693_haptic {
>>>
>>> static int max77693_haptic_set_duty_cycle(struct max77693_haptic *haptic)
>>> {
>>> - int delta = (haptic->pwm_dev->period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
>>> + int delta = (pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)) + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
>>
>> Double parentheses over argument are not needed so just:
>> pwm_get_period(haptic->pwm_dev) + ...
>
> Actually it was generated with coccinelle, hence I didn't fix existing
> coding style issues, but I have no problem fixing them.
>
There was no existing coding style issue. Your coccinelle script introduces it.
You might want to consider updating your script and remove the unnecessary (( ))
from it.
Guenter
> Thanks,
>
> Boris
>
>>
>> Beside that patch looks good, so with removing parentheses here and below:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>> int error;
>>>
>>> - error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta, haptic->pwm_dev->period);
>>> + error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta,
>>> + pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)));
>>> if (error) {
>>> dev_err(haptic->dev, "failed to configure pwm: %d\n", error);
>>> return error;
>>> @@ -245,7 +246,7 @@ static int max77693_haptic_play_effect(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
>>> * The formula to convert magnitude to pwm_duty as follows:
>>> * - pwm_duty = (magnitude * pwm_period) / MAX_MAGNITUDE(0xFFFF)
>>> */
>>> - period_mag_multi = (u64)haptic->pwm_dev->period * haptic->magnitude;
>>> + period_mag_multi = (u64)pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)) * haptic->magnitude;
>>> haptic->pwm_duty = (unsigned int)(period_mag_multi >>
>>> MAX_MAGNITUDE_SHIFT);
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
