Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
update.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
---
Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
--->8---
virtual patch
@@
struct pwm_device *p;
expression e;
@@
(
-(p)->polarity = e;
+pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
|
-(p)->polarity
+pwm_get_polarity((p))
|
-(p)->period = e;
+pwm_set_period((p), e);
|
-(p)->period
+pwm_get_period((p))
|
-(p)->duty_cycle = e;
+pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);
|
-(p)->duty_cycle
+pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))
)
--->8---
---
drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
index 6d96bff..a038fb3 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
@@ -70,10 +70,11 @@ struct max77693_haptic {
static int max77693_haptic_set_duty_cycle(struct max77693_haptic *haptic)
{
- int delta = (haptic->pwm_dev->period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
+ int delta = (pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)) + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
int error;
- error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta, haptic->pwm_dev->period);
+ error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta,
+ pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)));
if (error) {
dev_err(haptic->dev, "failed to configure pwm: %d\n", error);
return error;
@@ -245,7 +246,7 @@ static int max77693_haptic_play_effect(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
* The formula to convert magnitude to pwm_duty as follows:
* - pwm_duty = (magnitude * pwm_period) / MAX_MAGNITUDE(0xFFFF)
*/
- period_mag_multi = (u64)haptic->pwm_dev->period * haptic->magnitude;
+ period_mag_multi = (u64)pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)) * haptic->magnitude;
haptic->pwm_duty = (unsigned int)(period_mag_multi >>
MAX_MAGNITUDE_SHIFT);
--
2.1.4
