Hi, On Saturday 19 December 2015 10:51 PM, Heiko St?bner wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > Am Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2015, 16:22:32 schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I: >> On Friday 20 November 2015 02:52 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: >>> The otgphy clocks really only drive the phy blocks. These in turn >>> contain plls that then generate the 480m clocks the clock controller >>> uses to supply some other clocks like uart0, gpu or the video-codec. >>> >>> So fix this structure to actually respect that hirarchy and removed >>> that usb480m fixed-rate clock working as a placeholder till now, as >>> this wouldn't even work if the supplying phy gets turned off while >>> its pll-output gets used elsewhere. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> >>> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> >> >> I saw you've given your Acked-by in a previous version of this patch. >> Do you want me to take this in linux-phy tree? > > from my POV, this series should probably go through your tree in one go, as > this patch depends on the newly exposed clocks from the previous patch. So to > keep bisectability, it should most likely stay together. I agree. But I can't take another subsystem patch without getting a clear nod from the maintainer. I'll wait till tomorrow for Turquette to give his Acked-by. Thanks Kishon
