> If you don't read all the below, my belief is that we should simply > rename the strings in Addy's patch. We should change "rise-ns" to > "i2c-scl-rising-time" and "fall-ns" to "i2c-scl-falling-time". > Wolfram: can you confirm this is OK? I'm voting to leave the "-ns" > off the end of both to avoid asymmetry. New binding should have the "-ns" suffix, right? So, I'd vote to add the suffix to the new bindings and deprecate the ones used in the designware driver: "i2c-scl-rising-time-ns" and "i2c-scl-falling-time-ns" It might be a little more work now, but it will help us in the future, because it is the correct way to do it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20141204/f3578831/attachment.sig>
